Using our meeting time wisely: How effective are our meetings?
Spending time in meetings is not necessarily a bad thing... as long as they are effective! This page will walk our team through a process of scoring our own meetings, and then looking at results both at a team level and individually.
Step 1: Everyone, score your own meetings.
Add an effectiveness score for each of the meetings below.
Assign 1 heart (❤️) for meetings that are very ineffective and in need of change. Assign 5 hearts (❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️) for meetings that are especially effective and should be used as models / benchmarks for other meetings.
Note that the meetings are grouped by recurring vs ad hoc (i.e. non-recurring) meetings.
For recurring meetings: score the effectiveness of the meeting series. For ad hoc meetings: score the effectiveness of the individual meeting.
Step 2: Individual effectiveness score for is out of 5.
Before we look at our team-level results, everyone should look at their own scores. Here are a few interesting cuts.
Meeting time by effectiveness: You spend hours in ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ meetings ( of your meeting time).
This chart shows the total amount of time spent in meetings with each level of effectiveness. Where are you spending most of your time?
Meeting count by effectiveness: of your meetings are ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ meetings.
Here’s a grouped view of which are your meetings ranked from most to least effective. What patterns do you notice of your effective meetings?
Personal average effectiveness by weekday: Your most effective day is .
This is your average effectiveness score per day. Any patterns around which days are particularly effective vs not?
Step 3: Team effectiveness score is out of 5.
Now let’s look across the team. How effective are everyone’s meetings?
Meeting effectiveness by person: has the highest % of effective meetings at .
Meeting time by effectiveness: We spent hours in ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ meetings ( of our meeting time).
Ineffective joint meetings: of our joint meetings had low effectiveness scores.
Disagreements: of our joint meetings had wide disagreement in effectiveness.