Pages
Part II: Take action
2. Minimize ad-hoc meetings
Great Meeting Operating Systems avoid ad-hoc meetings in favor of more recurring, predictable meetings.
Why minimize ad-hoc meetings?
Teams have different opinions on the value of ad-hoc meetings. Some teams try to intentionally keep calendars empty and default to just-in-time ad-hoc meetings. But for most teams, ad-hoc meetings are a negative indicator and should be minimized. There’s a great writeup on this in the , but the key idea is that ad-hoc meetings tend to be (a) less timely than necessary and (b) lack the behavioral rituals that come out of a recurring forum.
To state it differently, “can I get the 5 of us together to chat about X for 20 minutes” often takes much longer to schedule than expected, and often has unclear expectations. Of course, not all ad-hoc meetings are bad — meeting with a customer or candidate is often not recurring, and sometimes there just isn’t a natural or timely forum for a discussion.
For this exercise, we’re going to focus on evaluating our ad-hoc meetings and using it to spot gaps in our Meeting Operating System.
Step 1: Classify our own individual ad-hoc meetings.
Let’s start with each team member’s individual calendars.
The below table is filtered to show the ad-hoc meetings for each person. We will assign one of these designations to each ad-hoc meeting:
Ad-hoc meeting classification
Description
Ok!
Necessary ad-hoc meeting. No change needed.
Cancelable
We probably didn’t need to have it at all.
New recurring forum
We should create a new recurring forum for this.
Existing recurring forum
This should have been handled in one of our existing recurring forums
[Note: indicate which existing forum in the next column]
No results from filter
Your ad-hoc meetings
Event
Classify this ad-hoc meeting
If existing forum, which one?
No results from filter
Step 2: Reflect as a team on our classification distribution.
Here’s a summary of how we characterized our ad-hoc meetings as a group. Does this match our expectations?
Ad-hoc meeting classification
Description
Total Duration (hrs)
% of Duration
Ok!
Necessary ad-hoc meeting. No change needed.
4.00
32.00%
Cancelable
We probably didn’t need to have it at all.
2.00
16.00%
New recurring forum
We should create a new recurring forum for this.
2.75
22.00%
Existing recurring forum
This should have been handled in one of our existing recurring forums
[Note: indicate which existing forum in the next column]
0.75
6.00%
Unclassified
3.00
24.00%
There are no rows in this table
12.50
Sum
100.00%
Sum
Step 3: Take action → Cancelable ad-hoc meetings.
Ready to make some changes! Let’s start with the ad-hoc meetings that were classified as . Here’s the list:
3
Cancelable
Who
Event
Classify this ad-hoc meeting
Retro prep
Cancelable
Sync with Jess
Cancelable
Alan <> Jess 1:1
Cancelable
No results from filter
We can’t go , but looking forward, what could you have done differently to make sure those meetings didn’t happen? Let’s discuss the list and add ideas for changes we’d like to make.
Add action idea for our cancelable ad-hoc meetings
Clear ideas
Action Idea
Author
Vote
Let's do this!
Can we move ad-hoc 1:1s to tag-ups?
2
I think async prep for retros would work.
1
No results from filter
Step 4: Take action → Requests for existing recurring forums.
Ok let’s move on to the ad-hoc meetings that were classified as . The list below is sorted by which forum each meeting was tagged to:
1
Existing recurring forum
Who
Event
Classify this ad-hoc meeting
If existing forum, which one?
Project sync
Existing recurring forum
No results from filter
Let’s discuss the list and add ideas for changes we’d like to make. Think about why these meetings were scheduled ad-hoc instead of as part of an existing forum — perhaps it’s just oversight? Or the existing forum needs a tweak in format/agenda/attendance/etc?
Add action idea for our existing recurring forums
Clear ideas
Action Idea
Author
Vote
Let's do this!
Could we reserve some time in kick-off for project syncs?
1
No results from filter
Step 5: Take action → Requests for new recurring forums.
Ok last step: let’s talk about the ad-hoc meetings that were classified as . Here’s the list:
3
New recurring forum
Who
Event
Classify this ad-hoc meeting
Team retro
New recurring forum
Recruiting sync
New recurring forum
Team retro
New recurring forum
No results from filter
Let’s discuss the list and add ideas for changes we’d like to make. Note that we don’t have to accept all requests, and in some cases, multiple requests can be handled with the same Action Idea!
Add action idea for our new recurring forums
Clear ideas
Action Idea
Author
Vote
Let's do this!
Can we add a recruiting tag-up?
1
How about a bi-monthly recurring retro?
No results from filter
Next up:
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.